It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....



Message Board
THIS MESSAGE BOARD IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. TO SEE OUR ACTIVE MESSAGE BOARDS, PLEASE GO HERE





Message
Posted by Liz R on September 21, 2000 at 10:55:41:

In Reply to: I think there's a difference between "classic" autism, and "regressive" autism posted by Yvonne on September 19, 2000 at 22:08:23:

: : My daughter was normal and then "became" autistic, from some outside cause. Although, a lot of the new theories state that children in utero can be poisoned or otherwise injured and be born with "autistic" syndrome, stil not the old style, 1 in 10,000 Kanner autism

Yvonne,

I don't think that even the Kanner old-style diagnosis was correct. I think that these children were exposed to something in the womb that caused them to have neurological dysfunction. I think that autism is increasing in numbers because we are injecting viruses into the bodies of precious young children almost every two months for the first two years of life.
More and more vaccines are currently being tested and when they are used, more and more children will be getting autism. Our kid's immune systems can't even stand up to cold viruses and are getting ear infections all the time because of the immune system assault from these immunizations.

Liz R.

Follow Ups

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:16 PM.



Site owned and operated by HealthBoards.comô
Terms of Use © 1998-2014 HealthBoards.comô All rights reserved.
Do not copy or redistribute in any form!