The letter from the ODAR came yesterday --
Yeah, I know he said it during the hearing - but seeing it in writing was sweet and another huge sigh came from my heart.
The odd thing tho was there were some things in his ruling that really did not apply to me.
Can the judge clump things together and make his own diagnoses? He made mention of two specific things I thought were odd; one I could see where he might come to his own conclusion, but the other has NOTHING to do with my case....
by the by, the letter has nothing in itr where I will come up for a review in 3,5 or 7 years --like I've seen others say was in the letters they've received.