mainecoon
06-09-2003, 08:40 AM
I have a strong bias against those who would take advantage of others who are desperate to find some hope in the midst of their tragedy. For this reason I've bookmarked such sites as the skepticring.com and quackwatch.com. Whenever I read of some alternative cancer therapy I search these sites to find some information other than the enthusiastic testimonials offered by the those who stand to make a buck selling the items. This is particularly true when dealing with "miracle" products that seem just too good to be true, and which are readily available on the internet for just $******** (you fill in the sum).
Of course, in most instances the fact that more people don't know about these products is the fault of the medical establishment. It is either dragging its feet in approving the product, narrow-minded in its approach to medical research, or it has its own greedy secret agenda which the miracle product would endanger by making this miracle cure available to everyone.
Recently I saw Essiac Tea suggested as a therapy for lung cancer. Or it might be Cassie Tea, depending on whether or not you're from Canada. I started looking for references with Google, only to find countless hits from enthusiastic testimonials. Of course these were interspersed with an equally large number of hits from retailers selling the item. It was when I ran across sites in Cyrillic that I became more than a little suspicious. The Russian entrepreneurial class has aggressively embraced the free-market system. Caveat Emptor is a phrase which speaks for itself in a system which has not yet encumbered itself with all manner of regulatory and oversight agencies.
As far as I'm concerned, an herbal tea will not cure lung cancer. I also believe that if it were true, my oncologist would be on the phone right now telling me to stock up. Anyone seeking to pin their hopes on Cassie (or Essiac) Tea should be aware of the phrase Caveat Emptor.
I would like to read any other thoughts regarding this.
Of course, in most instances the fact that more people don't know about these products is the fault of the medical establishment. It is either dragging its feet in approving the product, narrow-minded in its approach to medical research, or it has its own greedy secret agenda which the miracle product would endanger by making this miracle cure available to everyone.
Recently I saw Essiac Tea suggested as a therapy for lung cancer. Or it might be Cassie Tea, depending on whether or not you're from Canada. I started looking for references with Google, only to find countless hits from enthusiastic testimonials. Of course these were interspersed with an equally large number of hits from retailers selling the item. It was when I ran across sites in Cyrillic that I became more than a little suspicious. The Russian entrepreneurial class has aggressively embraced the free-market system. Caveat Emptor is a phrase which speaks for itself in a system which has not yet encumbered itself with all manner of regulatory and oversight agencies.
As far as I'm concerned, an herbal tea will not cure lung cancer. I also believe that if it were true, my oncologist would be on the phone right now telling me to stock up. Anyone seeking to pin their hopes on Cassie (or Essiac) Tea should be aware of the phrase Caveat Emptor.
I would like to read any other thoughts regarding this.

