RBrown
08-01-2005, 05:34 PM
I recently had a CT of the pelvis done, and it indicates, "1. Very large septated cystic mass in the pelvis most likely of ovarian origin." It is also dscribed as a large cystic mass in the pelvis, approximately 19 x 9 cm, containing septae, part of which are slightly thickened. This extends to both right and left sides. This appears to be separate from the uterus.
The CT also 2... "revealed two tiny hypodensities in the liver, too small to characterize." In another part of the report, they are described as incidental cysts.
My regular doctor ordered the CT...I had thought it was a hernia and hadn't really reacted quickly when it started to form two years ago.
The doctor thinks probably my OB-Gyn will recommend a hysterectomy...I'm 42. I would prefer the least invasive means, although I am close to menopause, and do you think laparascopy is feasible? What other alternatives are there. Which is best do you think? It seems like that's awfully big to pull out through my a tiny incision in my abdomen, but I'd prefer that.
Bottom line is, which is safest do you think? Would it be advisable to just wait until I'm post-menopausal? I do not have that heavy of a menstrual cycle, and I have pain only on the first or second days these times...my last one was extremely light, though I've had heavy flows for years? The doctors told my Mom to just wait when she had fibroids.
Then, again, it's only likely ovarian, though what else is in the uterus, except the uterus and ovaries, I don't know.
I also have been told to watch for the signs of lupus w/a positive ANA, a false syph, chronic ear infections (which may be related to my weird shaped nose or something), occasional rashing, and increasing allergies.
The CT also 2... "revealed two tiny hypodensities in the liver, too small to characterize." In another part of the report, they are described as incidental cysts.
My regular doctor ordered the CT...I had thought it was a hernia and hadn't really reacted quickly when it started to form two years ago.
The doctor thinks probably my OB-Gyn will recommend a hysterectomy...I'm 42. I would prefer the least invasive means, although I am close to menopause, and do you think laparascopy is feasible? What other alternatives are there. Which is best do you think? It seems like that's awfully big to pull out through my a tiny incision in my abdomen, but I'd prefer that.
Bottom line is, which is safest do you think? Would it be advisable to just wait until I'm post-menopausal? I do not have that heavy of a menstrual cycle, and I have pain only on the first or second days these times...my last one was extremely light, though I've had heavy flows for years? The doctors told my Mom to just wait when she had fibroids.
Then, again, it's only likely ovarian, though what else is in the uterus, except the uterus and ovaries, I don't know.
I also have been told to watch for the signs of lupus w/a positive ANA, a false syph, chronic ear infections (which may be related to my weird shaped nose or something), occasional rashing, and increasing allergies.

