annemv
02-06-2007, 09:44 AM
Hi
I have a 2.4 cm stone in pole of kidney and a 6mm and a 3mm:D
My docs are thinking that they need to keep them in?
I have been told that the 2.4 would take 5 or 6 of the hole through your back procedures.
They think that the risk of what damage could happen with all of these procedures out weighs the risk of what the stone is doing.
Anyone familiar with this?
Thanks!
I have a 2.4 cm stone in pole of kidney and a 6mm and a 3mm:D
My docs are thinking that they need to keep them in?
I have been told that the 2.4 would take 5 or 6 of the hole through your back procedures.
They think that the risk of what damage could happen with all of these procedures out weighs the risk of what the stone is doing.
Anyone familiar with this?
Thanks!

