I recently, within the last 2 months, had a mole removed. At the time, the doctor said it was either melanoma or nothing. It was removed, and the biopsy showed nothing. Great. Now the mole is back in full force, growing quicker than it ever did. My question... the first treatment was denied by my great group medical coverage (still in appeal process) should I get this new mole treated as well? The cost is adding up, but I wouldn't want to miss something. Is a once benign mole always so? Thanks for the insights.