| Re: confused
wow, what a freaking nightmare. can i ask just what real testing was done after in the ER to determine your real true extent and source of just what that doc "told you"' at that time was even a stroke and not something else brought on by trauma? just what types of real solid testing have you had done since this incident? i have absolutley no clue as to what a 'brain shock' actually is as far as what is it and how does it affect and impact you? i have worked EMS and was a firefighter for 14 years and have never once heard of this very pronounced type of symptomology you now have and did present immediatly post MVA actually.
now brain "trauma/injury" would fit much better and possibly, depending upon really the most here if you were or were not actual under your seat belt when this occured could be much more responsible for what you had as far as symptoms when you simply presented in the ER that day following the MVA. depending upon just how fast the other driver was going when you were hit and stationary too would really be the most critical part of just what your body and the brain actually absorbed as far as the kinetic energys involved when something going really fast just stops suddenly when it impacts a stationary object. you/and your body were that stationary object that the forces of that hit would have been transferred to, you know what i mean? this other driver could be solely responsible for what you are now left to have to deal with here.
it really sounds like the ER you went to was really sloppy at best when it came to really defining extent and overall mechanism of injury and allowing you to actually even leave that hospital at all given the condition you were in then. that really IS crazy in and of itself. i am wondering just what this "letter' was all about that simply gave you a totally different mechanism for your brain injury? was something tested or what here that finally gave them a clue that you did NOT actually have a freaking stroke after this time?
have you had at least a contrasted MRI done that actually shows just what is injured at the brain level at this point? have they ever bothered to also check out at the very least here your c spine area to jusdt see what is going on there that could also be injured just given how this occured in the first place?
like i mentioned above,i have NEVER ever in all the years i have actually worked trauma ever heard of having a brain bleed called some type of "brain shock". thats really insane to me. unless you do not actually even have any level of real brain bleed going on but actually even have these very pronounced symptoms? now THAT would be crazy.
i guess this begs the question here, did you actually suffer any level of true brain bleed? it is also very possible to have real bleeds within the c spine or the cord area too that could have impedded/impaired bloodflow to the brain? like you here i am just kind of confused as to how this whole thing has played out for you and what you just ended up with as far as losses/impairmens along the way from something called "brain shock"???????
what do you know definitely at this point as far as hard findings within your brain and the c spine area too? what has actually been tested with at least MRI and confirmed here as hard findings? and most importantly,do you yourself actually have all copies of every single type of testing result that they did on you? if not, you seriously NEED to obtain everything(just a matter of making some phone calls here). and i would also start with also obtaining ALL medical records from any and every doc/specialist that has laid hands on you since this MVA actually occured, including all ER records from that hospital.
just having all the docs/clinic records REALLY can be a goldmine of info for any patient when it comes to just finding out things that get placed in the dictation notes that are what your ongoing records actually consist of in a very big way. but more importantly, every doc has to give an overall 'impression" of that days visit and how they really see your situation. this is really what you need to see, the docs notes made after every single visit any doc actually has with you. i just have to do this for myself only becasue i have to see five seperate specialists to treat all my crap. it does help tons with trying to understand 'me' since my spinal cord injury kind of took 'me' away and changed everything about me and my life.
you just do deserve some real answers here and to find out the true extent of real damage and a good specialist who can just rx the appropriate types of ongoing therepies for you. alot of how this all goes would really depend upon your level of true injury. and i am just DYING to know exactly what IS a type of brain shock that could even begin to create what you have been living with here. that one i just do not get at all myself either. whoever it actually was who wrote you that letter simply OWES you a real explanation as to what that actually means.
i DO understand the complexities of various types of shock, that is what makes this so incredibly confusing. most types of shock get 'righted/resolved" with proper intervention or once the major reason is resolved. this is a whole different type of thing i have NEVER ever heard of, ever in all my years working trauma and actually dealing with different forms of shock. it just makes NO sense from that shock point of view, at all. i do hope you can get some answers here and things will still be able to get much better for you. pleasse keep me posted on all things, K? marcia
__________________
3-22-01,herniated C-6-7
11-20-01,placement of hardware for failed fusion
9-22-03,removal of cavernous hemangioma that was inside spinal cord. Neuro damage to L hand L leg and R leg.
|