| Re: breast sonogram
it's good to hear back from you so quickly Annamarie,
I wasn't sure if you'd get my reply.
You don't feel a thing huh?
they really said "bug bite"? what on earth does a bug bite have to do with an enlarged node in your underarm? where would the bug have bitten you?
By the way, I didn't think at all that you're an alarmist. You have every reason in the world to do as much research as you possibly can at this point. especially being they want to do a needle biopsy of the node.
I am very anxious to find out how large the node is since they feel a biopsy is warranted.
I read somewhere yesterday along my research that a node anything above 2cm is cause for a biopsy. But at another site another time, I read anything above 1cm.
So I dont' know now how large they consider it to be a red flag?
I really wish you the best. I'm sure you're shocked at the sudden news.
Did you have former *****'s? and if so, are they going to compare it to last years and the one before that?
the reason I ask is because when I made my apptn with the breast surgeon's office, the secretary told me I must bring the most recent ***** and the one before that, plus the image of the ultra sound with reports.
so I went yesterday to the hospital file dept. to get my copies. they put all 3 on a cd , plus gave me written reports.
I read the 2007 and 2008 reports and compared them.
After I have my *****'s, they send a letter stating the ***** was all clear. they don't send the orgininal letter that is sent from the radiologist to the ordering dr.
so I was surprised when I read one of the *****'s results that said:
"dense breast parenchymal pattern" which limits resolution. patients in this category should adhere to ACR guidelines of regular mammography, breast self palpation and regular clinical breast examination by health professionals.
PLUS they saw ovoid densities projected over the pectoralis muscles which are compatible with lymph nodes"
My doctor said NOTHING to me about the lymph nodes that were seen. the radiologist was not concerned, obviously since they didn't tell me anything about it.
But at the end of the sonogram report, it states that "further assessment of palpable abnormality should be determined on clinical grounds".
WHAT DOES THIS TERMINOLOGY MEAN? specifically " CLINICAL GROUNDS"?
do they think I should definetly get it checked out? or does it mean only if the dr warrants it?
am I being an alarmist?
I'll be thinking of you on Thursday and if you need to talk, just fire away, I'm here for you.
I won't tell you to try and relax, because I know I wouldn't be able to relax.
But I will say, try to think positive and before you know it, Thursday will be here and you'll finally get the results. I wish you the best. What time do you have to go in?
sincerely,
Linda
|