It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....



Cancer: Prostate Message Board
Post New Thread   Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2012, 07:38 AM   #1
Inactive
(male)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: California
Posts: 53
Akai HB User
Differences in Path Reports.

Had a consultation with a Uro at City of Hope yesterday, as part of a consultaion, CoH had their pathologist read my slides again. Their report pretty much confirmed the initial report issued by USC with the exception of lower the volume of two cores, added the length of lesions, and added one ASAP.

USC
Right Lateral Base = G6 = 10%
Right Base = G6 = 20%
Left Apex = G6 = 20%

City of Hope
Right Lateral Base = G6 = 5% = 1mm in length
Right Base = G6 = 10% = 2mm in lenght
Left Apex = G6 = 20% = 4mm in lenght
Left Mid = Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation.

I am curious as to how they determined the lenght of the lesions?

Again, I was offered both AS and Surgery. It looks like every hospital has an AS program now. Their requirements are pretty much the same as at UCLA.

 
Old 09-05-2012, 11:51 AM   #2
Inactive
(male)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 689
Tall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB User
Re: Differences in Path Reports.

They look at stained slides and note the appearance of the cells (Gleason grades) in the lesions. If that particular slide's cells are within normal range, it is not part of the cancerous length. Some pathologists are better at identifying those grades than others. That's why it's a good idea to have the cores read by a pathologist who specializes in reading prostate cancer only. It takes a lot of experience.

It doesn't look like the two readings would make a difference in your treatment options.

- Allen

 
Sponsors Lightbulb
   
Old 09-05-2012, 12:46 PM   #3
Inactive
(male)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: California
Posts: 53
Akai HB User
Re: Differences in Path Reports.

Thanks Allen. At this point I think I will not need to send my slides out to either John Hopkins or Bostwicks for another opinion? Supposedly, both USC and City of Hope are quite conservative in their gradings?

Akai

 
Old 09-05-2012, 01:23 PM   #4
Inactive
(male)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 689
Tall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB UserTall Allen HB User
Re: Differences in Path Reports.

It's not a matter of conservative. Sometimes the grading stays the same, sometimes upgraded, sometimes downgraded. But with two reports telling you practically the same thing, and more importantly, pointing to the same treatment options, I could see why you wouldn't need to see yet another one to increase your confidence.

 
Closed Thread

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Board Replies Last Post
Final got the Path report and it's not good! CM63 Cancer: Prostate 3 12-18-2009 04:17 AM
No celebration yet - Bad Path Report laswell Cancer: Prostate 6 10-31-2007 08:26 PM
Path to Potency jj1963 Cancer: Prostate 39 09-23-2007 01:05 PM
Therapy path post RP and radiation buka Cancer: Prostate 2 11-19-2006 01:58 PM




Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Sign Up Today!

Ask our community of thousands of members your health questions, and learn from others experiences. Join the conversation!

I want my free account

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 PM.



Site owned and operated by HealthBoards.comô
Terms of Use © 1998-2014 HealthBoards.comô All rights reserved.
Do not copy or redistribute in any form!