| Re: riding bike or running/walking?
Having been a competitive distance cyclist for many years, and recently adding running to my activities, I'd say there are a few distinct differences.
1) TIME. It takes roughly an hour to burn as many calories as you burn by running for twenty minutes. If you are pressed for time, running is the better choice on a daily basis. But if you have the time, cycling is more "fun."
2) DISTANCE. One of my favorite parts of cycling is the ability to cover some ground IF YOU LIVE IN AN AREA WHERE THAT IS POSSIBLE. If you live in an urban area, running is the better option. If you live in a less congested area, cycling would be my choice.
3) EQUIPMENT. You really don't need anything to run except a pair of suitable shoes. You need a bike and a helmet to cycle, which costs money. At one point, my bicycle was worth more than my car (but I also put more miles per week on the bike than I did the car).
4) ENVIRONMENT. I hate to run on a treadmill. I enjoy riding a stationary bike. If you are in a climate where the weather is less than ideal for year-round outdoor activities, take this into consideration.
5) CAMARADERIE. Running is more of a "solitary" sport, and the running clubs I've looked at seem to be more about "competitive" training (running to get faster or go further), but there are a lot more competitive running events than there are cycling events. The bike clubs I've been involved with are more "social" (cycling to visit interesting places or to cover specific distances), but the focus is usually not so much on "racing" as it is on spending time together and going on "adventures."
Someday, if there is any interest, I'll post up about some of the really great cycling trips I've taken over the years...
__________________
PhillyDude
from Philly, dude.
|