That is a good point, and even though she would not get a number to tell her how *many* calories she was burning, she could make a comparison based on heart rate.
The only variable is that in some situations, the heart rate goes up because of breathing heavy, not because of the efficient rhythmic muscle movement. Example: I've seen people do "speed" walking and "speed" eliptical, and it's making their heart rate go up because they're running on momentum, not on muscle power. The muscles burn the calories. Think of it in this regard: If breathing heavy and increased heart rate were all that were needed to burn calories, then panic attacks and hyperventilating would make you skinny. Both produce elevated pulse and respiration, but neither provide large rhythmic muscle movement.
This is where something that is weight bearing (like the treadmill) can actually cause you to burn more calories than a non-weight bearing exercise (such as the eliptical).
You do bring up a good point, however, that she can certainly use the heart rate reading as a gauge. My favorite method, though, is just "rating of perceived exhertion." If you take the time to get in touch with your body and how it "feels" while you're exercising, (rather than zoning out or trying to just get through it)... you can move your body and just feel what one gives you the better workout.
|