Hi Lenin,
You have a fertile mind, but at the moment we are juggling as many marbles as we can! Medications and naturopathy especially are very confusing.

There is no straight answer on so many things.
Just mention Lipitor in the blood channel and you end up having to fend off complaints from all around. (I was surprised just how strong the "anti-Lipitor" movement is.) But I am beginning to feel people, many people,
are affected badly by these drugs and I wonder is there a message that is just not getting through. That's another story for another day.
I think the answer to your J-curve question is we cannot do anything until we know the mechanism better - otherwise we just confuse cause and effect. Without knowing any details it seems possible that as the heart begins to fail, in a serious way, then the blood pressure would no longer be properly maintained throughout the body. This is simply saying that there might be a point where performance of the "pump" begins to drop as the pump itself is destroyed (not a nice word but...

). Is your J-curve a sort of cross-over point? With any reasonable data that should be pretty easy to work out.
Where does that place you then, if you decide to increase your diastolic BP?
At a guess I would say it's risky because your heart may already be working hard enough and pushing it harder may just increase the deteriorative processes. Those that win through are quite possibly the ones with the intrinsically strong hearts right from the start, and you cannot join that group by raising your BP to their level. A linear study of several groups with different starting BPs and continuing through to their later lives might answer this. So in essence I'm saying that those with greater mortality, and the lower average BPs, are just those who had physically weaker or flawed hearts from the start, and they failed earlier.
As a layman in this area that's the best I can do!
Beefy.