Hi,
It seems like your doctor is just being cautious by ordering another exercise stress test, this one with imaging. Sensitivity of en exercise ECG is lower than that of stress imaging. The test you'll be having is much more expensive than the one you've just had, but also more accurate, yielding more information than an exercise ECG stress test. It provides a good assessment of blood flow and detects any ischemic areas within the heart.
Do you know which test you'll be having? Your doctor might decide not to put you on a treadmill. If you are physically unable to exercise, pharmacological agents will be used to simulate exercise. I don't think people can fail this particular test - one actually doesn't do anything but lie on a gurney. A drug, such as dobutamine is used to simulate exertion. There are doctors close by if needed. Prior to the test, an IV injection of a tracer is given. The subsequent imaging shows the distribution of a radiotracer throughout the left ventricle. Any areas not receiving adequate blood flow can be easily seen. The ventricle volume and ejection fraction are also determined. Images are taken again at rest. The test is an easy one to have compared to others. The only side effect I had was a nasty, long-lasting headache from the tracer. There is a small amount of radioactivity during the imaging process.
I've had both types of stress tests. Regular stress testing in unsuitable for people with abnormal baseline ECGs and in certain cirumstances, including chronic kidney disease and long-standing hypertension. The accuracy of testing in such settings varies greatly. I read that for this reason, an ECG stress test is a waste of time in people with chronic kidney disease.
I don't think you will fail this test so don't worry. Let us know how it goes. Good luck!
flowergirl