In this country, we can sue anybody for anything. First, you have to ask what you want to get out of this. Second, you have to ask how much you want to put into it. By going to court, you will be making a public announcement of your being infected.
To get a judgement, you may have to show more than that he knew he had it. Showing that you asked him and he knowingly lied would be a major goal of yours. He can deny you ever asked him about it. Failure to get a doctors report is not proof. While it appears you can prove he knew he had it - and this may be sufficient - the defense will most likely attack your sexual history and try to show that you were aware of the risks and knowingly accepted them. I mean, can you prove that he DIDN'T tell you and you DIDN't agree to have unprotected sex with him knowing he was infected, and can you deny that you are aware that couples should not have unprotected sex until after they have been tested?
If I were on the jury, I might vote in your favor, but I might also be swayed by a defense arguement that since you didn't insist on seeing the results of a full STD screeen prior to engaging in unprotected sex, and that since you knew having unprotected sex was a risky thing, that you willing engaged in unprotected sex with someone of unknown background and, therefore, willfully exposed yourself.
While I wish cases such as yours were more widespread as it might slow down the spread of the infection, you will face a difficult battle. And, another thing, in a unique case such as yours, the local press might pick up on it and publish it and put you on TV. Can you handle that? It would make you a hero to the herpes crowd....
While I personally think you should win a judgement to have him pay for your medical expenses and treatment, the fact remains that you still had unprotected sex with him without seeing any test results. Perhaps taking him to small claims court and suing him for your doctor bills and prescriptions would be sufficient. Unless he has some big bucks, I doubt a lawyer would take this on a contingency basis, and to get a lawyer, you would be spending many thousands of dollars on a very uncertain outcome.
|