It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....



HIV Prevention Message Board
Post New Thread   Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-30-2002, 02:17 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: england
Posts: 27
ukguy19 HB User
Post HIV risk of Being a Top??

Just a general question. I understand there is a risk when having unprotected sex, and there is a risk in both giving and receiving. However, I am wondering just how risky being the giving partner actually is. The risks of taking is obvious, but as a top, how likely is it that enough HIV can be passed on, into the penis of the male from the anus of the recieving partner. I am talking more specifically about anal sex here. Anybody know of any sites on this topic?? I am not planning on doing it, but it would be interesting to know. Does lubrication make much difference? If the recieving partner is HIV+, and a minute amount of blood from the anus gets into the urethra, or into a microscopic cut on the head of the penis, does that automatically mean you get HIV, or just there is a risk? Any site i see, is very vague.

 
Old 08-31-2002, 08:18 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Trenton, ME 04605
Posts: 58
Yikes! HB User
Exclamation

When it comes to HIV, nothing is automatic. There have been times when HIV- people were exposed to HIV+ people in high-risk sex and did not catch the disease.

Any unprotected vaginal, anal, or oral sex carries a risk of HIV transmission provided at least one partner is HIV positive. Note that the risk for oral is lower than vaginal or anal but not nonexistant.

Further, the simple physics of the situation would seem to indicate it is more difficult but not impossible for the insertive partner to acquire HIV from an HIV-infected receptive partner. Again, that statement does not imply there is no risk for the "top" because HIV infection can and has occurred in that manner.

Hope this answers the question.

 
Sponsors Lightbulb
   
Old 09-10-2002, 10:53 AM   #3
HappyGirl2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I just read this statement from "adepressedguy". I dont know where he got his info but it sounds encouraging.


Testing at 6 weeks (HIV Antibody, Elisa) past your LAST exposure is very reassuring,but not 100% conclusive. Six week tests can offer confidence while waiting for the three month test. No futhur testing is "needed" after three months, but in cases of a possible significant exposure a six month test can be ordered to put the mind at ease. If your boyfriend had HIV, understand that it's not a 100% transmission rate per sexual act. It's roughly 3%-5% per act of anal sex, 1%-3% for vaginal, and far less than 1% for oral, if at all. G'luck and let us know.

 
Closed Thread

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Board Replies Last Post
Considering Active Surveillance for low risk cases - overcoming abhorrence IADT3since2000 Cancer: Prostate 7 05-26-2009 01:56 PM
How do I prevent passing my high risk HPV on to new people I am with?? paige24 Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 09-26-2008 03:31 PM
Active Surveillance - a sound option for truly low risk men IADT3since2000 Cancer: Prostate 30 03-02-2008 04:39 AM
Risk of HIV transmission from sexual activity plasva HIV Prevention 6 06-01-2007 04:37 PM
Low risk or no risk? claphands HIV Prevention 3 05-13-2007 04:40 AM




Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Sign Up Today!

Ask our community of thousands of members your health questions, and learn from others experiences. Join the conversation!

I want my free account

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:16 PM.



Site owned and operated by HealthBoards.comô
Terms of Use © 1998-2014 HealthBoards.comô All rights reserved.
Do not copy or redistribute in any form!