It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....



Lupus Message Board
Post New Thread   Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-19-2005, 11:14 AM   #1
Veteran
(female)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 489
Blessed4Life HB User
Does ANA-negative lupus exist?

Found this article and had to post it!!! Hope you find it useful!!

Does ANA-negative lupus exist? What other labs are helpful when thinking of this diagnosis, and what if all of them are negative?
Ask the Expert
Michael D. Lockshin, MD, MACR
Attending Rheumatologist
Hospital for Special Surgery
Professor of Medicine
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Director, Barbara Volcker Center for Women and Rheumatic Disease



The answer to the question depends on what is meant by lupus, and what is meant by ANA.

To start with the definition of lupus: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is one of many similar illnesses that affect young women and that cause arthritis, rashes, low white blood cell counts, low platelet counts, and kidney disease. (I'll ignore, for this discussion, discoid [skin], drug-induced and neonatal lupus.) The features that unequivocally diagnose SLE are (1) high titer anti-double stranded DNA antibody, (2) anti-Sm (Smith) antibody, (3) biopsy-proven kidney disease, or (4) biopsy-proven skin disease.* The antibody tests must be accompanied by symptoms, since antibodies alone, with no symptoms, do not diagnose the disease. If a patient has symptoms plus diagnostic antibodies or biopsy proof of disease, the patient has SLE. If the patient lacks all four, the diagnosis is presumptive, even in the presence of illness.

There is no real consensus among physicians how best to describe symptomatic patients who lack all four of the unequivocal features. This writer diagnoses "lupus-like" illness, "mixed connective tissue disease," "undifferentiated connective tissue disease," and "forme fruste (meaning incipient, or hidden form) lupus". Each has specific and separate meaning and describes different forms of illness. Most summaries report anti-DNA antibody in about half of patients, anti-Sm in about one-third, and ANA in 87-94% of patients with unequivocal SLE. Urowitz and Gladman cover this topic extensively in a textbook chapter.1 In another textbook, Edworthy offers a complicated algorithm for diagnosis of lupus, using ANA titer, related antibodies, complement levels and symptoms to derive "diagnostic certainty".2 Still other text books discuss the uncertainties of serological testing without specifying frequencies of antibody negativity.3 In this writer's practice, as many as one-quarter of patients referred for suspect SLE fall into the not-quite-lupus category, while persons who have any one of the four unequivocal features listed above have SLE.4
Some but not all physicians diagnose lupus, even ANA-negative lupus, in cases in which, to this author, another term would be preferable. Because the medical community does not agree, whether to diagnose a patient as having lupus or lupus-like disease is not a question of the physician's being right or wrong; it is a question of a physician's style. In either case, treatment options are the same.

Now, to the question of the meaning of ANA. The antinuclear antibody test is performed with different techniques in different laboratories; some techniques are more sensitive than others, such that one laboratory may find a (usually weak) positive test while another finds it negative. Some laboratories dilute 10-fold for screening (1:10), some as much as 100-fold (1:100), and some not at all. A commonly used method starts with a dilution of 1:10, then doubles with every successive dilution, so the next specimen tested is 1:20, then 1:40, 1:80, etc., the highest number positive being what the laboratory reports (for instance, 1:1280). Most lupus patients have sera that react at very high dilutions, essentially always more than 1:80, often more than 1:5120. Depending on the laboratory's reporting habits, a test that is positive at 1:10 or even 1:40 may be called either negative or weakly positive. Most laboratories count 1:80 and higher as clearly positive. The point is that ANA-negative does not always precisely mean completely negative. Another point is that speckled (as opposed to diffuse or peripheral) ANA patterns do not read well in automated immunofluorescence tests, so may be reported as lower titer or negative than they would be if they were hand read by an experienced technician.5
There is a further complication. The ANA is used to screen for lupus, not to diagnose it. This means that, for practical purposes, if the ANA is negative, lupus does not exist and no further testing need be done; indeed, some laboratories will not further screen sera that are ANA negative. If the ANA is positive, that means only that lupus is possible and that tests for antibody to double-stranded DNA, Sm (Smith), Ro/SSA (Sjogren's syndrome A), La/SSB (Sjogren's syndrome B), and RNP (ribonucleoprotein) must be performed to determine whether lupus is or is not present. Because of a variety of technical factors, it is possible to have a negative ANA but a positive specific antibody test, though this is very uncommon; for diagnosis a positive test for a specific antibody is more important than is a negative ANA test. Thus an "ANA-negative" person with strongly positive antibody to Sm would unequivocally have lupus (the author has seen many such patients). Because of this possibility, this writer, evaluating a new patient for lupus, usually simultaneously (to save time) tests for ANA, anti-DNA, anti-Sm, anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB, and anti-RNP, as well as for other abnormalities relative to the patient's specific condition. That is, he does not completely discard the diagnosis if the ANA test is negative, though the diagnosis is much less likely.

Now another complication: all of the above applies to the evaluation of new symptoms in an untreated patient at a specific time. In a lupus patient-or in a patient with suspect lupus-tests change over time, either improving or worsening. Furthermore, tests often revert to normal during treatment. If the question, "Can an ANA-negative person have SLE?" is asked of a patient with established or treated disease, it may be impossible to confirm or refute the diagnosis-on the basis of blood tests alone-made years earlier, or in a patient taking high doses of prednisone or immunosuppressive drugs. In our recent cross-sectional study of atherosclerosis in SLE studying treated patients with disease of variable duration, at the time of study, 42% had anti-DNA antibody and 10% anti-Sm.6 We did not specifically tabulate frequency of ANA.

The answer to the question, "Does ANA-negative lupus exist?" is technically "yes", with a large number of buts, and ifs, and whens. Another answer is that the question is not very important. It is never critical to say definitively that a given patient does or does not have lupus. What is important is to evaluate the current symptoms, to put the symptoms into an overall context that includes blood tests, duration of symptoms, other illnesses, and medications, and to develop a treatment plan based on the total information rather than on a blood test alone.

* The American

 
The following user gives a hug of support to Blessed4Life:
Conchette (01-18-2012)
Sponsors Lightbulb
   
Old 08-20-2005, 08:24 AM   #2
Junior Member
(female)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 40
deedea HB User
Re: Does ANA-negative lupus exist?

Wow! What a lot of information in one article. My whole thing is that dr.'s are very cautious about letting you see your actual lab results and things like this may be why. They figure if we have a little bit of knowledge then we will blow things out of proportion. My last dr. told me my cbc was normal, but, when I went back and got a copy of the results for my new dr. about 7 items were high or low, definately out of the normal range for that lab. When I asked her why she told me all was okay her response what that we needed to consider that those counts were the norm for me because they had been consistently low or high 3 consecutive rounds of testing. OKAY! thanks. Anyway, great article. Hope you are having a great weekend. God bless. deedea.

 
Old 08-20-2005, 08:31 AM   #3
Senior Veteran
(female)
 
Glojer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Louis, Mo. USA
Posts: 3,692
Glojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB UserGlojer HB User
Re: Does ANA-negative lupus exist?

Thank you blessed4life, that was great. Deedea I know what you mean, I get the results of all blood work mailed to me after the nurse calls with the results. She always says everything is OK but when I get the results something is either high or low.

Last edited by Glojer; 08-20-2005 at 08:34 AM.

 
Old 08-20-2005, 02:39 PM   #4
Facilitator
(female)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,942
VeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB UserVeeJ HB User
Re: Does ANA-negative lupus exist?

Hi, Blessed. Boy...! This really confirmed some of my long-held suspicions, esp. the one that some drs. test ANA, then stop cold if result is negative.

My own experience was to have rashes & a whole host of symptoms, but I was told again & again, "NOT LUPUS". I was ANA-negative to the bitter end, but was finally found to be positive for anti-Ro. Although skin tests suggested lupus from the get-go, I didn't learn THAT, either, until the bitter end. (But why should I use the word "bitter"? I was SO GLAD to finally get help!)

I scored a "4 of 11" at pt of Dx. I think my rheumie could have called me "SLE/Ro-lupus", or "subacute cutaneous LE" (SCLE). He called me SCLE, which has helped me on insurance issues. I'm not sure where that line is drawn---or maybe there is no clear line, similar to the other instances Dr. Lockshin describes here...

You know how a lot of us here encourage people in diagnostic limbo to ask for copies of their labs? After reading this, I hope even more of us scan the test names VERY carefully, to make sure MORE than just ANA is being performed.

All verrrrrrrrrrrry interesting, as one of those movie detectives might say. I hope you're having a really good weekend. Best wishes, from Vee & small dog

 
Old 08-21-2005, 06:42 AM   #5
Veteran
(female)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 489
Blessed4Life HB User
Re: Does ANA-negative lupus exist?

I am so happy that everyone is finding the article of interest and of help!

Blessings to all!!!!

Blessed

 
Closed Thread

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Board Replies Last Post
Does anyone else? Postie Chronic Fatigue 26 05-30-2009 06:45 PM
my ana test results came back as 1-1280 what does that mean sarahsp218 Arthritis 5 10-28-2008 09:55 PM
ANA titre anniebooboo Multiple Sclerosis 10 02-27-2008 12:05 AM
Cytoplasmic fluorescence on ANA test? ljs Lupus 11 02-19-2007 06:54 PM
ANA 1:1260 Is this significant? mommytorres Immune Disorders 11 01-21-2007 07:53 AM




Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Join Our Newsletter

Stay healthy through tips curated by our health experts.

Whoops,

There was a problem adding your email Try again

Thank You

Your email has been added








TOP THANKED CONTRIBUTORS



VeeJ (172), ladybud (43), AngelicBrat (16), luca689 (7), ksp (6), neveragain444 (6), luvinmusiq (5), Daisygrace (4), brooklyngirl (4), paperbgprinces (3)

Site Wide Totals

teteri66 (1180), MSJayhawk (1004), Apollo123 (905), Titchou (848), janewhite1 (823), Gabriel (759), ladybud (754), midwest1 (669), sammy64 (668), BlueSkies14 (610)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:25 AM.



Site owned and operated by HealthBoards.comô
Terms of Use © 1998-2014 HealthBoards.comô All rights reserved.
Do not copy or redistribute in any form!