Hi,
For those of you that have been following my posts, you know I've been diagnosed with "Hodgkin's" lymphoma & am starting treatment.
I was told at diagnosis, that "Hodgkin's" is "the easiest cancer to cure," and I'm holding onto that with all my strength. I understand "Non Hodgkin's" is curable, too--but, a little more extensive in treatment (if I'm understanding right).
Most of the people that are my age (early 50's) seem to have "non Hodgkin's"---or at least it seems that way. All these wonderful "ladies" I've been talking to, here on this forum, all seem to be relatively young (20's & 30's) ...or so it seems. I talked to my Oncologists' nurse yesterday, who told me a "survivor of Hodgkin's" (female) had come into the office to visit & had reminded my nurse of me. The nurse said she was "around my age, had a punk haircut, and she thought we were alot alike,"--- which made me think, that there's not that many of us diagnosed with Hodgkin's, around my age
I guess I'm just wondering why "Hodgkin's" seems to be more prevalant in younger people. I'm still trying to figure out the difference between "Hodgkin's" and "Non Hodgkin's," --- I think it's whether or not the disease has metasticized---am I right? I've been on websites and still can't figure it out....
I guess I'm "thinking out loud" again----
I think as your body ages, even though I'm in good shape, it's harder the older you get. I see the "younger" ladies expressing how treatment is hard, but they still seem to be able to work/go to school/etc... I admire that---I can't possibly see how I could function like that right now... but, then again, perhaps it's just the first treatment knocking me for a loop & not my 'age.'
Sorry for the rambling---I guess I'm feeling "old" today...Although, I remember my Oncologist ---one of the first things he said was, "Well...you're 'relatively' young....and healthy..." So that's a good thing!
Any feedback, peeps?

S.