Lynn45, wowee. That was me writing your post. It amazes me over and over again to meet people like you guys, Tigerdream and Lynn, who have the same bewildering over analytical thought processes.
Quote:
|
AND I absolutley have to know how everything I come in contact with works and why it works.
|
I totally understand. This helped me in some respects, and hurt me in other respects. It hurt me in a way that you might not expect. It's hard to explain, but I haven't been good at encapsulating knowledge. Everything tends to lay bare. I only feel comfortable with a problem when I can build it from ground up and "see" it. I have a good capacity for "seeing" the whole picture. But real-world problems get really complex. At some point, you have to group things and forget about the underlying complexities. This way you can solve bigger problems with more complex building blocks. So I have always feared projects where the complexity outgrows my ability to understand each nook and cranny.
So when somebody asks me, "Do you understand that?" I most normally say, "No.", even if I understand it better than anybody else. For me to understand is to be able to hold the entire thing at once.
This, of course, has its plusses too. I get real good at things.
But a lot of it is mechanical. What I mean is that I can solve problems brute force with an incredible tenacity (compulsive problem solving!). If you exhaust all possibilities you can solve most anything. It just takes time. Or you can divide and conquer. Spit a large problem in half 20 times, you can narrow things down quickly.
Anyways. That is mechanical. Then there are those that are fluid. Things just come to them. It is easy. There isn't a knot in the stomach, an ache that drives them. It's the difference between a real artist that paints a beautiful picture in a few graceful strokes, and the one (like me) who can grid a piece of paper and tenaciously draw using disciplined skills.
BTW: The egg came first... everybody knows that breakfast is before lunch :-)