Well I sure wish I would have read this before emptying my wallet of many thousands of dollars on hGh and other osteo treatments that did nothing. This is an article by S. Pors Nielsen from Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, May 2000. The abstract states that BMD is a poor indicator of bone strength, and that T-scores should be (but are not) calibrated for differences in sex, race, and bone size. He also suggests we need to re-define T-scores (of course, no one paid attention to this either; after all, if we took some people out of the osteoporosis category the drug companies would be out millions of $$ and we can't have that

)
Wow, that last one on bone size would be pertinent for me as I'm really "small-boned". But of course, no doctor ever took this into consideration; it was always "oh, your T-scores are below -2.5, you therefore have osteoporosis, you'd better start drugs right away"
Anyway, for those who are interested, here's the link:
[url]www.springerlink.com/content/41l8vhucm1gm9ma5[/url]