It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....



Schizophrenia Message Board
Post New Thread   Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2006, 06:56 PM   #1
Newbie
(male)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1
snacksmores2 HB User
Pet Theory

I have been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder. During a psychotic episode a year ago I developed a theory to explain my symptoms. The theory helped me to overcome my delusions and quell the auditory hallucinations I was experiencing. During the weeks of my recovery I expanded and consolidated the theory.
The idea still appears valuable to me, even now when I look at it with a relatively clear mind. I am wondering whether the theory is a vestige of my psychosis, whether or not it makes sense to others (or if it's just obvious to everyone). I would greatly appreciate external appraisal of the idea, to let me know if it holds water or if i'm crackers.
So if you're at-all interested read on!

My auditory hallucinations started out being relatively weak things, whispers that I could barely hear, tho I strained to make sense of them. They then grew to the point where I could hear them without trying. They then after several weeks began to get softer again. It was at this point that i began to suspect that my mind was imprinting words onto the static on my auditary channels. (I didn't really accept this tho because I was still off with the fairies). I noticed that there is always a faint hissing, a static that you can hear if you listen hard enough. Add to that background noise, cars wind etc and you get a constant background fuzz to everything we hear. I began to realise that it was possible that my mind was imposing order on that static , crafting the random sounds into words; interpretting the static as speech. Although I still believed in my delusions I started to hatch an alternative theory. My mind was searching for a specific kind of signal, speech, and it was searching among random data. And it was finding that signal in the random data not because it was there but because it was looking too hard and making order out of chaos. I envisioned the words I could hear as the result of a feedback loop between my conscious mind and the part of my mind attuned to interpreting sounds as speech patterns. Consciously I believed that someone was talking to me, therefore the part of my mind that looks for speech on the auditary channel was trying to find that sound. Lets call the part of my mind responsible for translation of sounds to speech patterns the speech processor. My conscious mind asked the speech processor to search for verbal signals. The speech processor complied and searched for specific sounds that it understood to be the components of speech. After searching the static it would find an example of a sound that could be interpretted as a component sound of speech. It would then return that component to my conscious mind. My conscious mind would then interpret the sound as the begining of a word. Take the sound 'th' for example, the speech processor would search for 'th' find it in the static and return 'th' to my conscious mind. My conscious mind would then realise that 'th' often signifies the begining of the word 'the' so it would send the speech processor a signal saying that it should now be expecting the sound 'uh' (as in th-uh = the). Dutifully the speech processor would search the static on the auditory channel for the sound 'uh' and would find it. My conscious mind then knew that it had heard the word 'the' and with this in place it would start to formulate what it expected to be the next word in the scentence. Say it decides that the next word is probably going to be 'day', it will send a request to the speech processor to search for the begining of the word, the sound 'd'. And so, as my theory goes, the scentence would continue to be conjured out of thin air . My mind was imposing what it expected to hear onto the sounds it was actually hearing. At each stage of hearing the scentence my mind was dynamically determining what it was expecting to hear next and of course hearing what it was expecting. Occasionally the speech processor would pick up a sound that it was not expecting to hear, say a 'y' sound caused by a loud background noise, this would be relayed to my conscious mind and I would have to make a reappraisal of what I was expecting the rest of the scentence to be. Thus novell ideas are fed into the mind in a stochastic manner, deepening the psychosis. Of course all this happens a little below what would be called the conscious mind, so you're never really aware of it. And it happens in quick succession so that the stream of sounds picked up by the speech processor gets interpretted easily as speech.

Urg, hopefully you followed that. I hatched this theory while dellusional. But the theory was not fully in place untill a few+ weeks into my psychosis. I wanted very much to prove to myself that this theory, this alternative to my delusions could be correct. To this end I began to test the theory out, tried to prove it. Firstly I noticed that the voices I was hearing appeared slightly slower than would be expected from normal speech, this would be expected if my theory was correct. Boyed by this early success I decided to play a game. I knew that the voices could hear my thoughts, so I knew that they knew that I had an alternative theory that threatened them. And they would not allow me to believe in that theory as it might provide me with respite and they were not friendly voices. So I knew that they would prove my theory wrong if they could. Cut a long story short, I managed to add syllabals, components of speech onto the ends of their scentences. Much to their chargrin... Over time I found I could manipulate what I was expecting to hear and so manipulate what I actually heard. For instance my first success was to add the word not into the mantra the voices were repeating. So that they would constantly contradict themselves. Thus I proved that the voices came from inside my head and that I was nuts. Whether the voices then faded because of medication or my drive not to listen to the voices, I don't know. Although the former is more likely.

If your still reading, I thank you! I found a way out of my delusions with this theory, maybe it itself is just a part of my psychosis . Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated! Thanks again

 
Sponsors Lightbulb
   
Old 08-21-2006, 06:22 AM   #2
Junior Member
(male)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 36
barney64 HB User
Re: Pet Theory

Wow! That's an interesting theory! You are obviously a very intellegent and creative fellow. It sounds plausible to me, but then I haven't any background in brain studies.

Last edited by barney64; 08-21-2006 at 06:23 AM.

 
Old 08-21-2006, 03:49 PM   #3
Senior Veteran
(female)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 1,326
marshmallow HB User
Re: Pet Theory

I couldn't follow the whole thing.

 
Old 08-21-2006, 07:51 PM   #4
Junior Member
(male)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 38
8-9-10 HB User
Re: Pet Theory

I would say its all in your mind and not very plausible at all. I have a sister whos schizoaffective and shes delusional too. Kinda funny how the mind can wonder off like that when mentally ill. Youre taking your medications and seem to be doing better and I would have to say the voices going away are probably from taking your medication. Youre lucky your case isnt too extreme though so you can function in society hopefully. Good luck. And please try not to think too much about this new found theory, and focus more on getting better.

Last edited by 8-9-10; 08-21-2006 at 07:53 PM.

 
Old 08-22-2006, 04:19 AM   #5
Junior Member
(male)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 36
barney64 HB User
Re: Pet Theory

I was taking a walk this morning and I thought I saw a dead squirrel in the road. As I got closer, I saw it was only a clump of dried leaves. Now that's not a hallucination but it is an example of how the brain takes limited information and fills in the blanks. Isn't that the basis for this theory or do I have it wrong?

 
Old 09-09-2006, 07:56 AM   #6
Newbie
(female)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 2
mh51867 HB User
Re: Pet Theory

I think that is very, very interesting and who knows? Schizophrenia is obviously due to misfiring, overactive or something else brain activity, so I think your theory is entirely plausable. Something in the brain being overactive. Unfortunately it's not going to be something anyone (anytime soon, anyway) will be able to verify or discount entirely.

I saw a show on 20/20 or Primetime the other night that was VERY intriguing to me. There was a woman suffering from extreme dibilitating depression and another from debilitating OCD. Both women underwent an experimental procedure where they implant electrodes deep in the emotional part of the brain and there is a pacemaker like device connected to them that delivers very, very low volt electrical currents (you can't feel them). It's a permanent implant. They were showing during the surgery that these electrical pulses could actually regulate emotion. A pulse here could bring laughter. A pulse there could bring crying. It cured both women - amazing, amazing. Of course it's still in the very early testing stages and who knows if it's even safe for permanent implants - but I was so intrigued. I thought perhaps years down the road this will be a cure for schizophrenia. Getting the brain to fire correctly. One can hope.

 
Old 09-13-2006, 05:32 PM   #7
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6
1unaccounted4 HB User
Re: Pet Theory

hey

i must admit i didn't read the whole theory, and im not trying to pokeholes in it BUT that static your hearing could be something that everyone should hear because...its the blood flowing through or around your ear drum...so essencially if you lisen it may sounds like static but its just your ear drums and circulatory working properly... i actually have to sleep with sound of a fan or a continuous humm because the "static" annoys me...but its just blood flowing and your ear drums can hear it if theres no other sound...but maybe im wrong.

 
Closed Thread

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Board Replies Last Post
Yet another Fibromyalgia theory/question ngtstrm Fibromyalgia 37 04-07-2009 07:28 PM
Over two years of being sickly, but I have a theory. Digerati Allergies 7 08-27-2008 01:51 PM
Theory on Fibro quickhandsrob Fibromyalgia 15 03-18-2008 10:56 AM
weird cause theory of TMJ velvetrance TMJ Disorder -TemporoMandibular Joint 3 02-18-2007 05:48 AM
ACNE: The New Theory kkpb7825 Acne 187 01-15-2006 03:58 PM




Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Join Our Newsletter

Stay healthy through tips curated by our health experts.

Whoops,

There was a problem adding your email Try again

Thank You

Your email has been added








TOP THANKED CONTRIBUTORS



soapandstars (4), synpase321 (3), hathada (2), gardenandcats (2), nightpassage (1), Stu 687 (1), Untreated (1), MissEllis00 (1), kunomn24 (1), always8 (1)

Site Wide Totals

teteri66 (1166), MSJayhawk (1000), Apollo123 (899), Titchou (835), janewhite1 (823), Gabriel (758), ladybud (747), sammy64 (668), midwest1 (665), BlueSkies14 (610)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM.



Site owned and operated by HealthBoards.comô
Terms of Use © 1998-2014 HealthBoards.comô All rights reserved.
Do not copy or redistribute in any form!