I have been reading these boards for quite awhile now and am noticing trends. I would be curious to know just how many people had a different back operation before they ended up with fusion and why they had to have fusion. It seems to me like there are a good number of people who have discectomies and end up with fusion down the line. I wonder why doctors don't just do fusion first? I realize that fusion is the last resort, but with so many people ending up there, why not start out there?
Has anyone here had fusion for anything less than an unstable spine?
Also, what is the success rate for those here with fusion? How many here are pain free???? Like, absolutely, no residual pain.
Has anyone's doctors told them that they could cure the pain?