Well dwpavlik,
You have to understand, my friend has only recently been diagnosed with diabetes. You, on the other hand have had 30 years first hand experience dealing with the disease. You obvously have the time, desire, etc to research and have educated yourself through the years on the subject. Not all diabetic people have your knowlege on the subject.
I am attempting to educate myself on the subject so as to verbally pass it along to my friend, who is a 42yo father of two, with a daily schedule that doesn't allow the time to educate himself on the subject. For example, he has never heard the term, glycemic index, and I see his eating habits.
You state: "The same problem I have had for 30 plus years is having non diabetics trying to cure or fix problems in a diabetic when they do not understand the intricacies of the control of the disease."
By your above statement, every non diebetic research scientist working on a cure for diabetes should not be researching diabetes, or their work should be invalidated because they are in fact non diabetic themselves.
Come on dude, I'm just trying to educate myself, to pass into my friend, who knows VERY little, even less than I do about his disease. I DO NOT claim to know anything about diabetes, just attempting to learn and discuss some of my ideas, IE: this diabetes discussion board.
Another article I read on ketosis -vs- ketoacidosis is below, and seems to contradict some of what you are saying. Please, I am not trying to question or challenge your knowledge, just trying to get a more complete picture on the intricacies of this disease. I appreciaty your sharing your knowlege and opinion.
**************************************** ************
Ketosis is a negative catch word for many people. The only reason can possibly be that
they're confusing it with diabetic ketoacidosis. But look how diametrically opposed they are. Ketoacidosis occurs in Type I diabetes, meaning it occurs because of an insulin absence or an insulin deficiency. Benign ketosis is achieved in overweight subjects whose metabolism is characterized by the fact that they put out too much insulin. Ketoacidosis is caused by an increased intake of carbohydrate, benign ketosis by a decreased intake of carbohydrate. There is, of course, acidosis in ketoacidosis, but in benign dietary ketosis the pH is 10 normal. There is no acidosis. In ketoacidosis, patients are extremely symptomatic, and in ketosis the subjects describe an improvement in well being. Now, that's pretty different.
**************************************** **************
So please bear with me....isn't ketoacidosis a state of high blood ketone levels ALONG WITH high levels of glucose??
If NO glucose were present in the blood of a diabetic person, regardless of how this condition was attained, along with an adequate level of ketones to fuel the brain ,and the person did not consume ANY carbohydrates, why could this state not be carried on indefinately without having to administer exodgenous insulin?? Consuming ANY anount of carbs while ketogenic would probably induce ketoacidosis in a type2 diebetic?? Also if no glucose were present, wouldn't this eliminate the possibility of acidosis??
Or
Would a diabetic person be healthier on a very low amount of low glycemic carbs, taken in evenly, say 5 grams of carbs per meal, 5 times per day, along with protein and fats, for a total of 25 grams carbs per day, along with a corresponding reduction in insulin intake?
I am NOT promoting any change to any diabetic persons diet without an endrocologist's or doctor's supervision as even I understand this could prove potentially fatal.
Thanks,
MAXS
[This message has been edited by MAXS (edited 09-04-2003).]
[This message has been edited by MAXS (edited 09-04-2003).]