As many of you know I had surgery in March 2003 and since that wonderful day I have been left with mind bending and boogling face burning pain on the left side. I am taking several medications to ease the pain, which are expensive despite insurance coverage and make me lethargic, and let us not forgot to mention have made me gain weight. I seriously didn't need any extra weight, and please remember my huge home improvement loan for this wonderful surgery! I mean they gave me a 5% percent cash discount.

Bitter?? NO way!
Anyway, about four months ago my OS mentioned I might need an arthocentesis to break up adhesions, which he thought might have been causing the pain, I elected not to do the arthocentesis. He couldn't guarentee that it might not cause more pain. I also in my gut didn't think it was the problem. I elected to see a neurologist instead, who started me on additional medication for my nerve pain. It has helped me a lot. I went in a couple of weeks ago, and my OS asked me if I was better since the arthocentesis? Okay, I didn't have an arthocentesis.

I think he has me confused with another patient. I told him "I didn't have the arthocentesis." I told him I was better only after seeing a neurologist who prescribed additional medication for me. He then tell me, "Well, I think it must be some nerve damage/something or an adhesion pulling on the nerve." I had him measure my bite which is now 40. It is better than three or four months after surgery. I think it was around 20 or 22 prior to surgery. He then goes on again to comment about me possibly needing orthognathic surgery for my bite-again. I told him I didn't think I was going to do that. I didn't need anymore nerve pain. My lower jaw is much more forward than my husbands and daughter, who had braces; so I don't get why I would need it other than maybe my open bite. Maybe he also has me confused on this issue? Who is to say? I am not having that surgery unless I get close to ten opinions from surgeons and orthodontist. Any input?