It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....



Cancer: Prostate Message Board

  • PSA velocity > 2.0 and assessing seriousness of prostate cancer

  • Post New Thread   Closed Thread
    Thread Tools Search this Thread
    Old 12-13-2007, 04:12 PM   #1
    IADT3since2000
    Senior Veteran
    (male)
     
    Join Date: Nov 2007
    Location: Annandale, VA, USA
    Posts: 2,207
    IADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB UserIADT3since2000 HB User
    PSA velocity > 2.0 and assessing seriousness of prostate cancer

    On Tuesday night a panel of three respected local doctors presented updates in their fields and answered questions for our Us Too support group. One was a urologist, one a radiation oncologist, and the third was a medical oncologist. None specialize in prostate cancer, but all have many prostate cancer patients in their practices.

    It was very interesting that both the radiation oncologist and the medical oncologist each chose to emphasize as one of his updates the importance of PSA velocity in assessing the seriousness of prostate cancer. Just a few years ago, PSA velocity was acknowledged as something to consider, but it hardly ranked with the number of cores and percent of cores and the percent of each core that was cancer, let alone with the big three: baseline PSA at diagnosis, the Gleason Score, and the clinical stage.

    The change is mainly due to two research papers written by teams led by the well-known prostate cancer researcher/physician Dr. Anthony D'Amico. The first, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in July of 2004, demonstrated that, for radical prostatectomy patients, whether the PSA increased by up to 2.0 or more than 2.0 in the year prior to diagnosis was a strong indicator of seriousness of the case and was independent of the baseline PSA, Gleason Score and stage. Having such a high velocity PSA resulted in many times greater death rates from prostate cancer. The second, published in July of 2005 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, showed a similar impact of a PSA velocity of greater than 2.0 on patients who elected radiation therapy. I've reviewed complete copies of these papers, and the risks are even higher if the cancer can be felt (and not much different if the cancer cannot be felt ).

    I've noticed that at least two other research teams confirmed these findings.

    What this means is that we should pay attention to our PSA doubling time (PSADT) in the year prior to our diagnosis, if we have the PSA results needed to calculate the PSADT, as most of us do. (Not me, though, but it's a cinch mine was greater than 2.0 since my baseline PSA at diagnosis was 113.6.) Some of us who don't have precise information about it can make good estimates: we don't have to get an exact velocity, we mainly need to know whether it was up to 2.0 or greater.

    There is good news as well as bad news here. While we now have an additional factor to indicate higher than normal risk considering the other factors, the reverse is also true: if our PSAV was less than 2.0 in the year prior to diagnosis, especially if it was much less than 2.0, that is an indicator that we will probably do better than the statistics indicate based just on the more established factors, particularly the baseline PSA, the Gleason Score, and the clinical stage.

    We should also remember that having a PSAV greater than 2.0 before diagnosis need not put us in the middle of the bull's eye. With knowledge that we are at greater risk, we can make decisions that improve our chances.

    If you want to read abstracts of these studies, go to our free, taxpayer supported US Government website [url]www.pubmed.gov[/url], and search for " "Preoperative PSA Velocity" OR "Pretreatment PSA Velocity" AND Risk of Death from Prostate Cancer AND d'amico [au] ". In fact, you can click on the pages icon with the green heading to get a free complete copy of the paper. To read just the abstract, click on the authors lists.

    It is remarkable that this change in understanding of pre-diagnosis PSAV has penetrated the consciousness of doctors treating prostate cancer patients in so short a time.

    Jim

     
    Sponsors Lightbulb
       
    Closed Thread

    Related Topics
    Thread Thread Starter Board Replies Last Post
    Prostate and Supplements Helopilot52 Cancer: Prostate 10 04-04-2011 05:46 PM
    PSA Fluctuate from 6 --> 4. Help!! micro Cancer: Prostate 9 06-19-2010 07:58 PM
    Hormonal therapy side effects: likelihood, seriousness, countermeasures IADT3since2000 Cancer: Prostate 6 03-10-2010 04:57 PM
    PSA velocity >2 and assessing seriousness of prostate cancer - AUA endorsement IADT3since2000 Cancer: Prostate 0 05-31-2009 04:50 PM
    Prostate Cancer Treatment Options daff Cancer: Prostate 18 04-14-2009 05:25 AM
    Psa >>> 28,000 pltrop Cancer: Prostate 5 04-12-2009 03:19 PM
    High PSA Velocity - Biopsy Monday - Scared! thbrown421 Cancer: Prostate 11 04-22-2005 03:21 PM




    Thread Tools Search this Thread
    Search this Thread:

    Advanced Search

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is Off
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off




    Sign Up Today!

    Ask our community of thousands of members your health questions, and learn from others experiences. Join the conversation!

    I want my free account

    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 AM.





    © 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved.
    Do not copy or redistribute in any form!