It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....

HIV Prevention Message Board

Can you have HIV and test Neg for years

Post New Thread   Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2003, 05:11 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 23
TK421 HB User
Exclamation Can you have HIV and test Neg for years

There seems to be some comfusion about this, and I'm not really sure what's what.

I have heard before from some people that over many years, they have been tested and came up negative. Then one day they test positive and firmly believe that they were only exposed years before. Meaning they had HIV and had been tested all that time with it coming back negative.

Is it true that you can get HIV, be tested over years with the results showing up as negative, and then show up positive years after exposure? Does HIV really stay that dorment over such a long period for time.

I know there is an incubation period, which was six months. When I got tested two years ago I talked to a case worker that said the tests they have now can get results after a month of exposure. So I always knew there was that very small window period. But years?

I didn't think that was possible. I know you can HAVE HIV and not get sick for years, but if you are tested, it shows up. I think the real problem is not the diseases, but the confusion people seem to have about them.

Also, the sources that told me these things were not that reliable and was second-hand information, but I'm hearing it more and more. And one person said their doctor told them this.

Is it true, or are people not wanting to admit the truth?


Sponsors Lightbulb
Old 06-17-2003, 05:40 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 262
anyone HB User

TK421. According to latest research and statistics, what you mention is possible, but extremely (and I do repeat), extremely rare. You do realize that no two people are exactly are their immune systems. There are even cases where patients who have testes positive at one time, dure to seroconversion, do something called "seroreversion", whoch would be clinically interpreted as "cured" from HIV. Sadly, there are only a handful of cases worldwide, and to the best of my knowledge are being monitored closely by the medical research.

In summary, is possible to pass many years before appearing + on an ELISA. But the 99.x (forgiveme for I do not have the exact decimal and I dont want to assume here), seroconvert within 6 months from exposure.
Best wishes.

Old 06-18-2003, 07:32 AM   #3
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: US
Posts: 363
Temperamental HB User

99% of people will test positive within 90 days or sooner. For somebody to go outside the 90 day, or even 6 month mark is rare. There are only a few cases of somebody going past 6 months. This is so rare I would not be concerned about this. Keep in mind that HIV testing has been drastically improved the past few years. Years ago it was probably possible to get a false result, but with testing so advanced now, it rarely happens. MOST people that find out they have HIV or AIDS were never tested in the first place, or had been exposed again since their last test, or tested within the window period.

Hope this helps.

Old 06-18-2003, 11:24 AM   #4
maybe helpful
Senior Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 503
maybe helpful HB User

From what I have read, many cases that take 6 months or more to manifest are cases in the nedical community. Usually if the have been infected through a needlestick, and often if they were infected with hepatits C at the same time. When you are exposed to a virus,your body begins to fight it, producing antibodies. That is what the HIV test is, it looks for the antibodies you body is making to fight the HIV. If you are healthy there is no reason to suspect your body would not do what it should. Usually, from what I have read, the people who take a while to test+ have weakened immune systems, or are exposed to other viruses at the same time. Good luck!!
Good Luck and Be Safe

Old 06-19-2003, 09:52 AM   #5
Posts: n/a

I too have heard of cases where ppl tested positive and then a few months later seroconvereted to a negative result. Mostly this seems to take place amongst babies born to infected mothers and one of the theories is that it is due to the unique immune system of infants and children. There have however been a handful of cases in which adults have apparently done the same. I am unsure of whether or not the explanation id that they miraculously seroconverted or theie positive result was false. Hell, I'm not very religious so call me a cynic! I have a hard time believing in the strange and unusual.

Old 06-19-2003, 01:37 PM   #6
I am +
Posts: n/a

Shan when I had my son they said he would most likely show + initially because babies take on Mom's antibodies. It's not until they develop their own that they will determine whether they will be + or not. He did show positive and with all newborns to infected mothers they started him on meds. 4 months later negative. He's never had another +.

Old 08-26-2003, 12:22 AM   #7
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Junction City
Posts: 1
spatten HB User

I have one thing to say to ur question ,and the answer is yes.I have and anut that went 14 years before a doctor decided to test her they told her all kinds of thing.When they decided to finally do the hiv test on hercome to find out that she had this deadly disease for the hole time that she had been going to the doctors.She was one of those people that was faithful the only thing she was forced to do was drugs with her hubby and I stress forced.He would hold her down and have his friends inject her and he would inject her witht he same needle that everyone else had used.She told her doc all of this and still it took them 14 years to find out so yes to ur question a person can have hiv for years before they know.
Just trying to help

Old 08-26-2003, 09:17 PM   #8
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Morristown, NJ USA
Posts: 9
Gabriel230 HB User

A person can be HIV positive and test negative in two instances -

1) When a person has been recently infected and he or she hasn't produced antibodies yet. The vast majority of people will seroconvert 4-6 weeks after exposure. A very small minority will take up to 6 months.

2) When a person is in the very late stage of AIDS he or she can test negative because their immune system has been completely eradicatd and they don't have any antibodies left. In this instance you would know that you are HIV positive as you would have a host of opportunistic infections.

People don't go on for years testing negative if they are positive. Today the consensus is that testing 13 weeks past potential exposure yields a conclusive result...unless you are an IV drug user, were possibly infected via needlestick or have an existing autoimmune disorder.

[This message has been edited by moderator1 (edited 09-01-2003).]

Old 08-27-2003, 03:56 PM   #9
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 23
TK421 HB User

Again, you can see the confusion. There seems to be more people who say it isn't possible, then the few who SWEAR it has happened.

I think Spatten was confused about the question. Spatten, you said you "have an anut that went 14 years before a doctor decided to test her." Then she was NOT tested for HIV in those 14 years - had she been tested FOR HIV in all that time, she might have known so much sooner. It isn't the symptoms were talking about to show up, but the virus itself. Can it stay hidden while you test for years and years.

Basically that would mean a whole lot more people would be at risk. Couples trying to have babies can think they are being safe and responsable by getting tested, but therefor spread it to their partner unkowingly? This would be the same for ANY couple. How are we then to be protected if we go get a test and it really dosn't show up for years. It's a little hard to believe but there are people I know - although I do not trust any of what they have to say - who swear they had to have had HIV for years and tested Negative. (I think that they actually did know or at least didn't get tested until they got sick. Two of my friends are in relationships and I believe would lie since they don't want to be caught possibly cheating.)

It seems to still be in debate so hopefully more people will share their knowledge about this topic.

Closed Thread

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Board Replies Last Post
do you have these physical symptoms? agoodday Anxiety 13 06-28-2010 03:35 PM
Can you have herpes 2 for years? mskmal Herpes 17 04-21-2010 06:44 PM
stress test for angina? elphers Angina 2 10-09-2008 01:45 PM
PSA Levels Went Down On Second Test. Should I Still Get A Biopsy? builder Cancer: Prostate 10 12-19-2007 12:11 PM
Calcitonin Test............ Oleander53 Thyroid Disorders 4 06-15-2007 06:25 PM
Failed my driving test for the second time mellyuk Anxiety 7 05-21-2007 11:28 AM
just found out i have hep c det Hepatitis 5 03-03-2004 10:33 PM
diet and test results Kaycee41 High Cholesterol 10 11-24-2003 04:13 AM
Anxiety ....should I test again or am I safe...psl answer Denisssss HIV Prevention 3 08-28-2003 12:03 AM
Drug Test......MAJOR PROBLEM shadetree_00 Open to All Other Health Topics 5 08-25-2003 03:04 PM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Sign Up Today!

Ask our community of thousands of members your health questions, and learn from others experiences. Join the conversation!

I want my free account

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 AM.

Site owned and operated by HealthBoards.comô
© 1998-2018 HealthBoards.comô All rights reserved.
Do not copy or redistribute in any form!